Witnesses at House Committee Hearing Testify of DoddFranks Adverse Effects

Witnesses at House Committee Hearing Testify of DoddFranks Adverse Effects

first_imgWitnesses at House Committee Hearing Testify of Dodd-Frank’s Adverse Effects Dodd-Frank Act Financial Stability House Financial Services Committee 2015-07-10 Seth Welborn Share Witnesses at a recent House Financial Services Committee hearing testified the Dodd-Frank Act has “reduced financial stability” and made Americans worse off financially in the controversial law’s first five years of existence.The hearing, titled “Dodd-Frank Five Years Later: Are We More Stable?” was the first in a series of three full Committee hearings to examine the impact Dodd-Frank has had on American consumers and the country’s financial system and economy since President Obama signed it in to law in July 2010. The focus of Thursday’s hearing was on how the 400 new regulations enacted in the 2,300-page law is a threat to the country’s financial stability.”What is undebatable is the fact that since the passage of Dodd-Frank the big banks are now bigger; the small banks are now fewer,” Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Texas) said in his opening statement at the hearing. “In other words, even more banking assets are now concentrated in the so-called ‘too big to fail’ firms. Pray tell, how does this improve financial stability?”One of the witnesses, Todd Zywicki, Professor of Law at George Mason University and Mercatus Center Senior Scholar, said that American families were not better off five years after Dodd-Frank went into law.”Instead, the overall impact of Dodd-Frank has been to slow our economic recovery, raise prices, reduce choice, and eliminate access to the financial mainstream for American families,” Zywicki said. “And low-income Americans have been hit the hardest.”While supporters of Dodd-Frank say the law has put an end to “too big to fail,” members of the Committee said Dodd-Frank enshrined “too big to fail,” into law, leaving taxpayers exposed to the risk if the economic stability of financial institutions designated as “too big to fail” was to be threatened.  One key takeaway from Thursday’s hearing was that the drafters of Dodd-Frank claimed the financial crisis was caused by a lack of regulation, when in reality financial regulations increased in the decade preceding the recession.”Although a few modest improvements have been made to increase financial stability, I believe Dodd-Frank, no net, has reduced financial stability,” said Mark Calabria, Director of Financial Regulation Studies, Cato Institute, one of the witnesses at the hearing. “The reason for such is a combination of both errors of commission and omission. Moral hazard has been increased by Dodd-Frank’s expansion of the financial safety net and increased concentration of risk into fewer entities, while the primary 18 causes of the crisis were largely left untouched. I fear if we continue along our current path, we are almost certain to see another financial crisis sometime in the next decade.”Another key takeaway from Thursdays hearing is the new bureaucracies borne out of Dodd-Frank such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Financial Stability Oversight Council operated without a system of checks and balances yet have the ability to “fundamentally alter” the U.S. economic landscape and affect the financial livelihood of millions of Americans. The “shadow regulatory system” created by Dodd-Frank poses more of a threat to the Americans’ financial well-being than the “shadow banking system” does, as the Obama administration claims,” according to the Committee.The Committee also claimed at the hearing that a key portion of Dodd-Frank, the Volcker Rule, has caused a lack of liquidity in capital markets, which gives them less capacity to deal with economic shocks.”After the bill that was to become Dodd-Frank was reported out of the Conference Committee, Chris Dodd famously said, ‘No one will know until this is actually in place how it works,'” said Paul Atkins, former Commissioner, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, a witness at the hearing. “Five years later we still do not know the full effects the Dodd-Frank Act will have on U.S. capital markets. We do know, however, that the costs of Dodd-Frank have been borne not just by Wall Street, but by ordinary investors and businesses of all shapes and sizes.”The second hearing in the series, titled “Dodd-Frank Five Years Later: Are We More Prosperous?” is scheduled for July 28 in the House Financial Services Committee. The date of the third and final hearing in the series, titled “Dodd-Frank Five Years Later: Are We More Free?” will be announced later, according to the Committee.center_img July 10, 2015 474 Views in Daily Dose, Featured, Government, Newslast_img

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *